Federal domain

The federal government tends to manage millions of acres of the forest land in the country. However, there is the increasing pressure on agencies to permit different levels of commercial access to timber, water flow, and other resources. I believe that the government should have the absolute prohibition on commercial access. A company that claims to be ethical should not seek commercial access to the land. When following my perspective, it will allow the land to remain the way it is without any agencies depleting the land. The decision will also ensure that the country ensures safety for its wild animals, and there are no parties trying to destroy the natural resources. In case there is a working compromise from the companies, it will make it extremely hard for the federal government to restrict company’s access that wants more access to the land. The government must have an absolute prohibition on commercial access to the forest because maintaining the balance between the commercial land and the forest is necessary. When the government is controlling land, there are usually many competing pressures on land use from the vocal environmentalists, vocal companies, and union lobbyists who are trying to protect jobs (Fieser & Moseley 2012). There is a substantial need for regulations that will help in controlling the operations of companies so as to ensure they do not harm the environment. I believe that there should not be a working compromise with companies because companies are likely to permit exploitation for their benefit while the habitats continue to suffer.

From the ethical perspective of a group I belong to, it would consider it ethical to turn common lands over to private ownership. Private ownership would produce an incentive to sustain the value of the land (Fieser & Moseley 2012). When the government owns the land and companies have a chance of exploiting resources with the full support of the law, they are likely to do so. It is in the interest of companies to maximize returns from their efforts. So as to avoid exploitation, the best solution would be to privatize the land and give companies the incentive of looking after what they own. 

If I manage millions of acres of forest land, I will consider proposing a law that will require companies to participate in operations that do not cause harm to the environment. The law must include steep penalties for those companies that pollute the environment. Implementing the law will help in ensuring that organization are environmental safe for humans and also animals. When there are no laws, it is likely for the society to encounter devastating effects. Organizations fail to look at the big picture and only focus on making profits and it is essential for this though process to change (McEvoy, 2005). Hence, it is important to propose environmental laws that will ensure companies do not cause much human misery. I would also encourage consumers to act in an ethical manner so as to help save our environment. If consumers know that the product that they are using is leading to diminished use in the future, they should avoid consuming the product. Such an act will encourage companies to start conducting operations that do not harm the environment. When there are no laws, companies are likely to destroy forests, and such actions would have a negative effect on the wildlife and also the society. 

Reference

Fieser, J, & Moseley, A. (2012). Introduction to Business Ethics Bridgepoint Education, Inc

McEvoy, T (2005). Owning and managing forests Island Press

Sherry Roberts is the author of this paper. A senior editor at MeldaResearch.Com in nursing writing services. If you need a similar paper you can place your order from best custom term papers.